Home » chemotherapy » Currently Reading:

Is lung cancer always a terminal illness?

Tags: , , 8 Comments

Lung cancer is not always a terminal disease. Small cell lung cancer usually responds to both chemotherapy and radiation if caught early enough but is nearly always terminal by the time it reaches stage IV. again! Any comments?

Related Posts

Currently there are "8 comments" on this Question:

  1. Roseanna says:

    To have terminal lung cancer means that the cancer will not go into so that they don’t succumb to their illness before they are absolutely required to pass. My mother died of this not too long ago, so you can always message me if you’re

  2. Gertha says:

    Im so sorry to hear about your dad. I know, both from my own experience with cancer and from watching people I love going through it and dying from it, how tempting it is to search for anything, however unlikely, that might help.But Im sorry, theres not a scrap of scientific proof that hemp oil can cure or have any effect on cancer.Ive watched Rick Simpsons Run From the Cure a number of times. What I saw was a number of unsubstantiated testimonials – no way of knowing if these people had ever had the conditions they claimed, and certainly no way of knowing if theyd been cured. But Ill accept they had those conditions. And as Ive had cancer, the ones whod had cancer were the ones to whom I paid most attention. And you know what?? – theyd had conventional treatment as well, but had chosen to credit the hemp oil with the improvement in their condition.This often happens with alternative treatments – a patient has chemo and feels crap, because chemo makes you feel crap. After the chemo is over, s/he takes some alternative medicine; soon s/he begins to feel better. Well, thats no surprise, you do begin to feel better when chemo is over. But s/he chooses to give the credit for feeling better, and for subsequent improvements in her/his condition, to the unproven alternative rather than to the conventional treatments, which have been rigorously tested and proven in double-blind clinical trials.And thats whats happened with the people in Run From the Cure.Those who claim hemp oil cures cancer usually claim that this knowledge is being suppressed because theres no profit in naturally occurring substances; In fact its common for synthetic derivatives to be made that are an improvement on the original, and its also common to get patents on the methods of isolating or administering the substance.So even if a pharmaceutical couldnt make money directly from hemp oil, if hemp oil, or marijuana, were effective they could make plenty of money and get plenty kudos from developing a safer, more effective derivative. The chemotherapy drug Taxol is derived from yew.But so far hemp oil has not been proven effective against cancer, so pharmaceutical companies dont bother with it. Theyre after profits, after all, and theres no profit in an ineffective treatment.The same people also overlook the fact – or perhaps dont realise – that cancer isnt one disease , its an umbrella term for over 200 diseases. The difficulty with finding a cure for cancer is that different cancers are caused by different things, so no one strategy can prevent them all .They all respond to different treatments so no one treatment can cure them all. Theres no magic bullet, no single substance that can reverse all types of cancer, and there never will beBesides, anything that claims to cure everything from cancer to weight problems to insomnia – the claims Simpson makes for hemp oil – has to be regarded with suspicion at best, dont you think??.

  3. Liza says:

    if a man who has lung cancer and is now terminal feeling unwell missed many days was to return to work work and so on then. md’s please answer. please? if that man had been br

  4. Leisa says:

    Approximately 3.5 million people in the United States will be diagnosed with cancer in 2010, according to cancer.org. The survival rate varies on the person and type of cancer. Although many people will battle and beat cancer, many others w… More:http://www.ehow.com/how_7271071_give-terminally-ill-cancer-patients.html

  5. Hyon says:

    In most cases this would be anything from 2 months to 3 years. One can in many cases prolong life expectancy with drugs slowing down the cancer. Problem is often severe side-effects from that sort of medicine, and it might be a choice of pa… More:http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_life_expectancy_on_terminal_lung_cancer

  6. Lori says:

    It means that it won’t get better, it will only get worse. You either have to get a lung transplant, or die. Answer NO! Lung transplant is NOT a treatment for lung cancer. "Terminal" means "causing, ending in, or approaching death" accordin… More:http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_terminal_lung_cancer

  7. Tiera says:

    Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. . but this is not always true, especially with rib and vertebral metastases with radiculopathy. .. It is perhaps the most underutilized benefit available to patients with terminal illness.

  8. Felecia says:

    Receiving the news of terminal cancer is the beginning of what will likely be the most difficult time of a person's life. Emotions, hopes, fears and illness are just a part of what's to come. Receiving a terminal ovarian cancer diagnosis is almost always. Terminal stage lung cancer is essentially the final stage of the disease. Detail:http://www.ehow.com/how_4878979_deal-terminal-cancer-patient.html

Comment on this Article:

Related Posts

What are your chances of having lung cancer after smoking 40 years?


What illness causes severe joint and body aches and throat to bleed?


What is the deadliest illness?


What is the food born illness that has Yellow in its name?


Are pneumonia and lung cancer similar?


Is there a cure for lung cancer?


Is ovarian cancer terminal?


What is ovary illness?


What are the side affects of lung cancer?


What are the symptoms of water borne illness?